4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Intertidal polychaetes from Abu Musa Island, Persian Gulf, with a new species from the Perinereis cultrifera species complex (Annelida: Nereididae)

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0025315417001564

Keywords

Taxonomy; new records; Indo-Pacific; polychaete fauna

Funding

  1. University of Tehran
  2. Iranian National Science Foundation [92006737]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polychaetes of 31 species from 17 families (Amphinomidae, Chrysopetalidae, Eunicidae, Glyceridae, Hesionidae, Iphionidae, Lumbrineridae, Maldanidae, Nereididae, Oenonidae, Phyllodocidae, Polynoidae, Sabellidae, Serpulidae, Syllidae, Terebellidae, Trichobranchidae) were studied from five locations around Abu Musa Island, the Persian Gulf. Perinereis iranica sp. nov. is described as a new species for the Persian Gulf. Perinereis iranica sp. nov. is most similar to members of the Perinereis cultrifera species complex, which are also found in the Persian Gulf, but can be most easily distinguished from them by the number, shape and arrangement of paragnaths in Areas V and VI. Perinereis camiguana is compared to members of the genus Pseudonereis, and found to resemble them closely, but until type specimens can be re-examined, we recommend treating this species as Nereidinae incertae sedis. Fifteen species, belonging to 13 genera: Eunice 'sp_Abu Musa', Marphysa 'sp_Abu Musa', Glycera cf. tesselata, Hesione splendida, Lumbrineris 'sp_Abu Musa', Notoproctus 'sp_Abu Musa', Nereis sp. cf. N. pelagica, Eteone 'sp_Abu Musa', Harmothoe liaoi, Potamilla 'sp_Abu Musa', Branchiosyllis cf. exilis, Trypanosyllis 'sp. 1_Abu Musa', Trypanosyllis 'sp. 2_Abu Musa', Terebella 'sp_Abu Musa', Terebellides cf. stroemi are reported for the first time from the Persian Gulf; nine species remain to be named formally. Three genera: Notoproctus, Eteone, Terebella are recorded for the first time from the Persian Gulf.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available