Journal
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 2082-2089Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5333-4
Keywords
Arthroplasty; Revision; Bisphosphonate; National registry
Categories
Funding
- Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund [04-2017-0710]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
PurposeThis study hypothesized that the use of bisphosphonates (BPs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with a lower implant revision rate. This study aimed (1) to investigate the association between BP use and the revision rate of TJA and (2) to determine the relationship between the medication period and the revision rate of TJA.MethodsNational Health Insurance Service data on surgeries, medications, diagnoses, and screenings of 50million Koreans were reviewed. People who underwent TJA in the period from 2002 to 2012 were identified and followed until 2016. During that period, 331,660 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 56,043 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Among them, 8447 knee patients (2.5%) and 2851 hip patients (5.0%) required revision surgery due to aseptic loosening. Demographic data, the duration of BP medication, and comorbidities were identified. The rate of revision surgery according to BP medication was investigated. The extended Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the effect of the medication period.ResultsThe rate of TKA revision was 1.4% for BP users and 2.9% for BP non-users (p<0.001). The THA revision rate was 2.8% and 5.3% for BP users and non-users, respectively (p<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) of revision was significantly lower in patients who took BP medication for more than one year (TKA HR=0.472, 95% CI [0.350-0.637]; THA HR=0.490, 95% CI [0.247-0.972]) compared to that in short-term users (less than 1year).ConclusionsThe use of BPs after TJA was associated with a lower revision rate. The use of BPs for more than one year further reduced the risk of revision. Bisphosphonate use can be highly recommended to reduce the revision rate of TJA.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study, Level III.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available