4.0 Article

Projection of Future Global Offshore Wind Energy Resources using CMIP Data

Journal

ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 134-148

Publisher

CMOS-SCMO
DOI: 10.1080/07055900.2019.1624497

Keywords

global ocean; CMIP5 wind data; offshore wind energy; positive trend

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research [SKLEC-KF201707]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41490642, 51709140, 41471005, 51739010, 51709243]
  3. key Laboratory of Coastal Disasters and Defence ministry of Education [201703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Offshore wind energy has the potential to ease energy and environmental crises, improve people's living standards on remote islands, and, finally, make contributions to sustainable development. Accurate energy evaluations should be performed before the exploitation of offshore wind energy; this includes not only assessments of the resource's historical characteristics but also a focused effort on understanding future issues. Using simulated wind data from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, phase 5 (CMIP5), this paper compares and analyses wind energy characteristics globally for the 2080-2099 period (future) relative to the 1980-1999 period (past). The classification of both past and future wind energy is also presented. The results show a positive trend for future global offshore wind energy. Compared with the past, the extent of areas with wind power density (WPD) greater than 400 W m(-2) will expand. In the future, across most of the global oceans, the effective wind speed occurrence and the occurrence of a WPD higher than 200 W m(-2) will be greater than that in the past, generally by 10%. The extents of the sub-rich, available, and poor regions will decrease, while the regions with a wind energy class of 7 will expand. The future wind energies of the North and South Poles show a seesaw phenomenon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available