4.2 Article

Mathematical Models to Describe the Kinetic Behavior of Staphylococcus aureus in Jerky

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 371-378

Publisher

KOREAN SOC FOOD SCIENCE ANIMAL RESOURCES
DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e28

Keywords

jerky; mathematical model; Staphylococcus aureus; Weibull model

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea [16162MFDS584]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to develop mathematical models for describing the kinetic behavior of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in seasoned beef jerky. Seasoned beef jerky was cut into 10-g pieces. Next, 0.1 mL of S. aureus ATCC13565 was inoculated into the samples to obtain 3 Log CFU/g, and the samples were stored aerobically at 10 degrees C, 20 degrees C, 25 degrees C, 30 degrees C, and 35 degrees C for 600 h. S. aureus cell counts were enumerated on Baird Parker agar during storage. To develop a primary model, the Weibull model was fitted to the cell count data to calculate Delta (required time for the first decimal reduction) and rho (shape of curves). For secondary modeling, a polynomial model was fitted to the Delta values as a function of storage temperature. To evaluate the accuracy of the model prediction, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated by comparing the predicted data with the observed data. The surviving S. aureus cell counts were decreased at all storage temperatures. The Delta values were longer at 10 degrees C, 20 degrees C, and 25 degrees C than at 30 degrees C and 35 degrees C. The secondary model well-described the temperature effect on Delta with an R-2 value of 0.920. In validation analysis, RMSE values of 0.325 suggested that the model performance was appropriate. S. aureus in beef jerky survives for a long period at low storage temperatures and that the model developed in this study is useful for describing the kinetic behavior of S. aureus in seasoned beef jerky.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available