4.6 Article

On the Reliability of Half-Cell Tests for Monovalent (Li+, Na+) and Divalent (Mg2+, Ca2+) Cation Based Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 164, Issue 7, Pages A1384-A1392

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0411707jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme [715087]
  2. Toyota Motor Europe
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in RD [SEV-2015-0496]
  4. Honda RD Europe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive study is reported entailing a comparison of Li, Na, K, Mg, and Ca based electrolytes and an investigation of the reliability of electrochemical tests using half-cells. Ionic conductivity, viscosity, and Raman spectroscopy results point to the cationsolvent interaction to follow the polarizing power of the cations, i.e. Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Li+ > Na+ > K+ and to divalent cation based electrolytes having stronger tendency to form ion pairs - lowering the cation accessibility and mobility. Both increased temperature and the use of anions with delocalized negative charge, such as TFSI, are effective in mitigating this issue. Another factor impeding the divalent cations mobility is the larger solvation shells, as compared to those of monovalent cations, that in conjunction with stronger solvent - cation interactions contribute to slower charge transfer and ultimately a large impedance of Mg and Ca electrodes. An important consequence is the non-reliability of the pseudo-reference electrodes as these present both significant potential shifts as well as unstable behaviors. Finally, experimental protocols in order to achieve consistent results when using half-cell set-ups are proposed. (C) The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available