4.6 Article

Numerical Simulation of Micro-Galvanic Corrosion in Al Alloys: Effect of Geometric Factors

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 164, Issue 2, Pages C75-C84

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1221702jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council
  2. 111 Project in China for promoting international exchange [B12012]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51271029]
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [RMA11-0090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A finite element model for simulating the propagation of intermetallic particle driven micro-galvanic corrosion in an Al-matrix model system is presented. The model revealed dynamic changes related to localized corrosion, including the moving dissolution boundary, the deposition of reaction products (Al(OH)(3)), and their blocking effect. Modelling was focused on the effects of key geometric parameters, including the radius of cathodic particle (range 0.5 to 4 mu m) and the width of an assumed anodic ring surrounding the particle (range 0.1 to 2 mu m). Simulations revealed the dynamic flow of molecular and ionic species, along with influence of geometrical constraints. For ring widths below 0.5 mu m, deposition of Al(OH)(3) inside the dissolving volume was inhibited due to limited transport of OH- and O-2 into a constrained volume - resulting in local acidification. An increase in cathodic particle radius at given ring width resulted in a greater dissolution by providing a larger cathodic area for O-2 reduction, quantifying the effect of cathode/anode ratio. The model was also developed to include two cathodic particles to explore any interaction. The present study reveals a physicochemical model that contributes toward a framework for multi-process localized corrosion systems, which can be further adapted to commercial alloy systems. (C) 2017 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available