4.6 Article

Contact between Garnet-Type Solid Electrolyte and Lithium Metal Anode: Influence on Charge Transfer Resistance and Short Circuit Prevention

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 164, Issue 4, Pages A666-A671

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0841704jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. research project, Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program for Specially Promoted Research for Innovative Next Generation Batteries of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST-ALCA SPRING)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interface structure between Li and garnet-type Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12 (LLZT) solid electrolyte was investigated by means of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) on symmetric cells of Li vertical bar LLZT vertical bar Li. Charge transfer resistance (R-CT) between Li and LLZT was investigated using LLZT pellets with various roughness. R-CT and activation energy (E-a) obtained on the flat interface is as high as 746 Omega cm(2) and 0.51 eV at 25 degrees C, respectively, indicating that the charge transfer reaction at Li vertical bar LLZT (grit number: #8000) interface is a kinetically slow process, which may suppress rate capability of all solid-state batteries. Although the lowest R-CT of 363 Omega cm(2) was obtained by heating up to the melting point of Li for the LLZT pellet polished with an emery paper (#400), it is supposed that electrochemically effective contact area was saturated for rougher surfaces of LLZT. To prepare interfaces with large effective contact area, Li electrodes were deposited on a LLZT pellet by vacuum-evaporation, which exhibited further low R-CT of 69 Omega cm(2). The interface with large effective contact area is also a key to prevention of short circuit, and a high critical current density of 0.4 mA cm(-2) was demonstrated. (C) 2017 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available