4.4 Review

Ecological momentary assessment in the investigation of craving and substance use in daily life: A systematic review

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 1-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.024

Keywords

Craving; Relapse; Ecological momentary assessment; Experience sampling methodology; Systematic review

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health
  2. Aquitaine Regional Council [20091301018]
  3. French Government Addiction Agency MILDT
  4. French National Research Agency
  5. CNRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Craving is viewed as a major determinant of relapse in persons with substance addiction, but this association remains poorly understood due to its time-limited nature and the biases associated with retrospective reporting. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers new opportunities to examine both craving and substance use with strong ecological validity by collecting real-time data in daily life. This review examined all published studies using EMA to: (1) assess the link between craving and substance use; and (2) identify relevant moderators of craving among substance users. Methods: We searched PubMed and PsycInfo databases up to October 31, 2013. Results: Ninety-one studies were selected, involving mostly tobacco smokers (73%). A majority of studies (92%) reported a positive relationship between craving and substance use, concurrently and prospectively, and among users with different levels of use for both legal and illegal substances. Results suggest that craving is a stronger predictor of relapse episodes when assessed in close temporal proximity to substance use. EMA data also confirmed the influence of diverse within-person and between-person sources of variation in daily life craving reports. Conclusions: This review provides strong support for the link between craving and substance use, and underscores the importance of the timing of assessments. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available