4.6 Article

Influence of Aliovalent Substitutions on Oxygen Reduction on Tantalum Oxynitrides

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 164, Issue 6, Pages F645-F650

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1361706jes

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) - Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2013/03408-0, 2014/11923-5, 2016/13323-0, 2013/16930-7]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [306469/2016-2, 306213/2013-3, 477153/2013-5]
  3. NSF [DGE-1650441]
  4. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-1120296]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [16/13323-0, 13/03408-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of active and stable oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysts using low-cost, abundant elements is of critical importance to the widespread adoption of proton-exchanged membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Tantalum-containing compounds, such as tantalum oxynitrides, can catalyze ORR in acid, with the degree of oxidation proposed to play a central role in controlling the ORR activity. Herein, we report the incorporation of aliovalent ions in tantalum oxynitrides (Ta-ON) and their effect on the ORR activity in acid. We synthesize Ta-ON by utilizing urea as the nitrogen source and use aliovalent (Ti4+) and isovalent (Nb5+) substitutions to evaluate the influence of the aliovalent substitution on the ORR activity. We found that an aliovalent Ti4+ substitution increases the ORR activity by 3x, which we attribute to improved electrical conductivity and increased ORR active sites. In comparison, isovalent Nb5+ substitution or carbon inclusion as oxycarbonitride did not positively affect the ORR activity. Our finding points to the important role of defects and conductivity in the Ta-based ORR electrocatalysts. (C) The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available