4.6 Article

ECA: High-Dimensional Elliptical Component Analysis in Non-Gaussian Distributions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 113, Issue 521, Pages 252-268

Publisher

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1246366

Keywords

Multivariate Kendall's tau; Elliptical component analysis; Sparse principal component analysis; Optimality property; Robust estimators; Elliptical distribution

Funding

  1. NSF [DMS-1712536, IIS-1546482, IIS-1408910, IIS-1332109]
  2. UW faculty start-up grant
  3. NSF CAREER Award [DMS-1454377]
  4. NIH [R01-MH102339, R01-GM083084, R01-HG06841]
  5. [NIBIB-EB012547]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a robust alternative to principal component analysis (PCA)called elliptical component analysis (ECA)for analyzing high-dimensional, elliptically distributed data. ECA estimates the eigenspace of the covariance matrix of the elliptical data. To cope with heavy-tailed elliptical distributions, a multivariate rank statistic is exploited. At the model-level, we consider two settings: either that the leading eigenvectors of the covariance matrix are nonsparse or that they are sparse. Methodologically, we propose ECA procedures for both nonsparse and sparse settings. Theoretically, we provide both nonasymptotic and asymptotic analyses quantifying the theoretical performances of ECA. In the nonsparse setting, we show that ECA's performance is highly related to the effective rank of the covariance matrix. In the sparse setting, the results are twofold: (i) we show that the sparse ECA estimator based on a combinatoric program attains the optimal rate of convergence; (ii) based on some recent developments in estimating sparse leading eigenvectors, we show that a computationally efficient sparse ECA estimator attains the optimal rate of convergence under a suboptimal scaling. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available