4.7 Article

Influence of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Rates of Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 20, Pages 2475-2484

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.540

Keywords

atrial fibrillation; direct oral anticoagulants; oral anticoagulation

Funding

  1. American College of Cardiology's National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  3. Biosense Webster
  4. Biotronik

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Oral anticoagulation (OAC) with warfarin is underused for atrial fibrillation (AF). The availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may improve overall OAC rates in AF patients, but a large-scale evaluation of their effects has not been conducted. OBJECTIVES This study assessed the effect of DOAC availability on overall OAC rates for nonvalvular AF. METHODS Between April 1, 2008 and September 30, 2014, we identified 655,000 patients with nonvalvular AF and a CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score of >1 in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry PINNACLE registry. Temporal trends in overall OAC and individual warfarin and DOAC use were analyzed. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression identified patient factors associated with OAC and DOAC use. Practice variation of OAC and DOAC use was also assessed. RESULTS Overall OAC rates increased from 52.4% to 60.7% among eligible AF patients (p for trend <0.01). Warfarin use decreased from 52.4% to 34.8% (p for trend <0.01), and DOAC use increased from 0% to 25.8% (p for trend <0.01). An increasing CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was associated with higher OAC use (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.07), but with lower DOAC use (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96 to 0.98). Significant practice variation was present in OAC use (median odds ratio [MOR]: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.45 to 1.57) and in DOAC use (MOR: 3.58; 95% CI: 3.05 to 4.13). CONCLUSIONS Introduction of DOACs in routine practice was associated with improved rates of overall OAC use for AF, but significant gaps remain. In addition, there is significant practice-level variation in OAC and DOAC use. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available