4.2 Article

Analysis of neck and shoulder postures, and muscle activities relative to perceived pain during laptop computer use at a low-height table, sofa and bed

Journal

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-192942

Keywords

Notebook computer; position; electromyography; discomfort; non-desk location

Funding

  1. Faculty of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwirot University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Laptop computers are used in various places and situations. The number of laptop users experiencing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) has increased drastically due to, in part, inappropriate workstations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neck and shoulder postures, and muscle activity relative to perceived pain when using the laptop at a low-height table, sofa, and bed. METHODS: Twenty male participants aged 18-25 years were randomly assigned to perform laptop computer operation at 3 workstations for 10 minutes during which neck and shoulder angles, muscle activity, and pain were recorded by using an Electrogoniometer, Electromyography (EMG), and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. RESULTS: Neck flexions when working at the sofa (18.6 degrees +/- 12.2 degrees) and bed (17.2 degrees +/- 10.5 degrees) were significantly (p < 0.05) greater than that at the low-height table (7.8 degrees +/- 6.5 degrees). However, shoulder flexion when working at the low-height table (28.2 degrees +/- 13.0 degrees) was significantly (p < 0.05) greater than that at the sofa (13.8 degrees +/- 8.6 degrees) and bed (10.91 degrees +/- 7.8 degrees). Working at the low-height table caused the shoulder flexor muscle activity to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher than working at the sofa and bed. Neck pain was reported during laptop computer use at the sofa and bed, and upper back pain when working at the low-height table. CONCLUSIONS: High neck flexion and pain were found while working at sofa and bed, whereas high muscle activity at shoulder and upper back pain were found while working at the low-height table.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available