4.3 Article

Autonomic complexity and emotion (dys-)regulation in early childhood across high- and low-risk contexts

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 1173-1190

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579419000683

Keywords

autonomic nervous system; dynamical systems; emotion regulation; entropy; fractal; respiratory sinus arrhythmia

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [T32 MH015755]
  2. University of Minnesota Interdisciplinary Fellowship
  3. Irving B. Harris Professorship
  4. Institute of Child Development Graduate Student Small Grants Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing the ability to regulate one's emotions in accordance with contextual demands (i.e., emotion regulation) is a central developmental task of early childhood. These processes are supported by the engagement of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), a physiological hub of a vast network tasked with dynamically integrating real-time experiential inputs with internal motivational and goal states. To date, much of what is known about the ANS and emotion regulation has been based on measures of respiratory sinus arrhythmia, a cardiac indicator of parasympathetic activity. In the present study, we draw from dynamical systems models to introduce two nonlinear indices of cardiac complexity (fractality and sample entropy) as potential indicators of these broader ANS dynamics. Using data from a stratified sample of preschoolers living in high- (i.e., emergency homeless shelter) and low-risk contexts (N = 115), we show that, in conjunction with respiratory sinus arrhythmia, these nonlinear indices may help to clarify important differences in the behavioral manifestations of emotion regulation. In particular, our results suggest that cardiac complexity may be especially useful for discerning active, effortful emotion regulation from less effortful regulation and dysregulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available