4.1 Article

Sensitivity of Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Progression of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 549-558

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12804

Keywords

volumetry; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; biomarker; effect size

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS070815, R01 NS080816]
  2. Jay D. Schlueter Ataxia Research Fund
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [P41 EB015894]
  4. Institutional Center Cores for Advanced Neuroimaging Award [P30 NS076408]
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award [UL1TR000114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) causes progressive degeneration of the cerebellum and brainstem. Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was shown to be more sensitive to disease progression than the most sensitive clinical measure, the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), in longitudinal studies, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was shown to detect neurochemical abnormalities with high sensitivity cross-sectionally in SCA1. Objectives The objectives of this study were to compare the sensitivities to change of volumetric MRI, MRS, and SARA in a 3-year longitudinal study in SCA1. Methods A total of 16 early-to-moderate stage patients with SCA1 (SARA 0-14) and 21 matched healthy participants were scanned up to 3 times with 1.5-year intervals. Ataxia severity was assessed with SARA. T-1-weighted images and magnetic resonance spectra from the cerebellar vermis, cerebellar white matter, and pons were acquired at 3T. Results The pontine total N-acetylaspartate-to-myo-inositol ratio was the most sensitive MRS measure to change (-3.9 +/- 4.6%/yr in SCA1 vs. -0.3 +/- 3.5%/yr in controls; P < 0.02), and the pontine volume was the most sensitive MRI measure to change (-2.6 +/- 1.2%/yr in SCA1 vs. -0.1 +/- 1.2 in controls; P < 0.02). Effect size (mean percent change/standard deviation of percent change) of pontine volume was highest (-2.13) followed by pontine N-acetylaspartate-to-myo-inositol ratio (-0.84) and SARA (+0.60). The pontine N-acetylaspartate-to-myo-inositol ratio was abnormal for 1 premanifest patient at all visits and predicted study withdrawal as a result of disease progression in 3 patients. Conclusion Both MRI and MRS were more sensitive to disease progression than SARA in SCA1. Pontine volume was most sensitive to change, whereas MRS may have more sensitivity at the premanifest stage and predictive value for disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available