4.6 Review

The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8020052

Keywords

Staphylococcus; MRSA; SSCmec; colonization; typing; lipoglycopeptides; oxazolidinones; ceftaroline; daptomycin; pleuromutilin

Funding

  1. National Youth Excellence Scholarship [NTP-NTFO-18-C-0225]
  2. Observership and Mentorship Programme of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Staphylococcus aureus has been an exceptionally successful pathogen, which is still relevant in modern age-medicine due to its adaptability and tenacity. This bacterium may be a causative agent in a plethora of infections, owing to its abundance (in the environment and in the normal flora) and the variety of virulence factors that it possesses. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains-first described in 1961-are characterized by an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a/c) and resistance to all penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems, which makes the beta-lactam armamentarium clinically ineffective. The acquisition of additional resistance determinants further complicates their eradication; therefore, MRSA can be considered as the first representative of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Based on 230 references, the aim of this review is to recap the history, the emergence, and clinical features of various MRSA infections (hospital-, community-, and livestock-associated), and to summarize the current advances regarding MRSA screening, typing, and therapeutic options (including lipoglycopeptides, oxazolidinones, anti-MRSA cephalosporins, novel pleuromutilin-, tetracycline- and quinolone-derivatives, daptomycin, fusidic acid, in addition to drug candidates in the development phase), both for an audience of clinical microbiologists and infectious disease specialists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available