3.9 Article

Evaluation of cyclodextrin-micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquid surfactant as a pseudostationary phase for chiral separation

Journal

SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 137-145

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/sscp.201800145

Keywords

chiral separation; ionic liquids; micellar electrokinetic chromatography; surfactants

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373378]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150697]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ionic liquids have drawn increasing attention in separation science recently. As a new promising brand of surfactants, ionic-liquid-based surfactants have their unique properties and superior aggregation behavior, which can be introduced as micelle-forming surfactants in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography mode. There have been few reports of the applications of ionic-liquid-based surfactants for micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography enantioseparation. In this study, pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids surfactants were applied for the first time for chiral separation with hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin as a chiral selector by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. As observed, the established micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography systems with ionic-liquid-based surfactants could provide better separation of tested chiral drugs than conventional non-ionic liquid cationic surfactant. In addition, parameters such as the alkyl chain length, concentration of ionic-liquid-based surfactants, type and proportion of organic modifier, concentration of chiral selector and composition and pH of buffer solution were systematically investigated to optimize the cyclodextrin-micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available