Journal
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
Volume 176, Issue 9, Pages 2517-2538Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1138-z
Keywords
Feminism; Misogyny; Gender; Kate Manne; Raunch; Backlash; Patriarchy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
How are patriarchal regimes perpetuated and reproduced? Kate Manne's recent work on misogyny aims to provide an answer to this central question. According to her, misogyny is a property of social environments where women perceived as violating patriarchal norms are kept down' through hostile reactions coming from men, other women and social structures. In this paper, I argue that Manne's approach is problematically incomplete. I do so by examining a recent puzzling social phenomenon which I call (post-)feminist backlash: the rise of women-led movements reinstating patriarchal practices in the name of feminism. I focus on the example of raunch feminist' CAKE parties and argue that their pro-patriarchal dimension cannot be adequately explained by misogyny. I propose instead a different story that emphasizes the continued centrality of gender distinctions in our social normative life, even as gendered social meanings become increasingly contested. This triggers meaning vertigo, a distinct form of social anxiety and the reactionary impulse at the heart of (post)-feminist backlash. Meaning vertigo both complicates the answer to Manne's main question-why is misogyny still a thing?-and suggests the need and opportunity for a different kind of feminist political intervention.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available