4.6 Article

Water-Tunable Highly Sub-Wavelength Spiral Resonator for Magnetic Field Enhancement of MRI Coils at 1.5 T

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 90304-90315

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927359

Keywords

MRI; resonator; RF lens; RF coil; spiral

Funding

  1. SUTD Digital Manufacturing and Design (DManD) [RGDM1830102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), several studies have demonstrated that the metamaterial-based structures can effectively improve the sensitivity, and thus the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), of receiving radio-frequency (RF) coils. However, the use of metamaterials for this type of the MRI application is often limited due to the bulkiness of the metamaterial structure at RF wavelengths and a lack of frequency tunability of the final design. In this work, we propose a planar compact sub-wavelength (< lambda/50) spiral resonator to increase the sensitivity of a receive coil with frequency tunability for the 1.5 T MRI. Its double-layered spiral design with a cavity embedded in the substrate between the two spirals allows water deposition for frequency tuning. At the resonance frequency of 64 MHz, the spiral resonator shows a 24% improvement in terms of the B-1(-) field at the depth of 30 mm into a load experimentally. Even at a penetration depth as much as 60 mm (deep brain in the case of head imaging), an enhancement of 9% was observed. Moreover, the magnetic field enhancement comes with a decrease (10%) in specific absorption rate (SAR). In terms of tuning, by controlling the water level in the cavity, the proposed spiral resonator shows a wide tuning range of 35 MHz, centered around 64 MHz, with high tunability sensitivity (2.4-0.75 MHz/ml or 15-4.8 MHz/mm), which is due to the fact that the tuning cavity is located between the two spirals, where the fields are highly confined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available