4.6 Article

Efficient all-air processed mixed cation carbon-based perovskite solar cells with ultra-high stability

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 29, Pages 17594-17603

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta05744g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0406704]
  2. NSFC [21676017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI(3)) perovskite commonly used in hole-transport material (HTM)-free carbon-based perovskite solar cells (C-PSCs) is unstable in ambient conditions, and its glove box preparation process is essential but incompatible with the low-cost mass-production of C-PSCs. Although mixed cation/halide type perovskites are more durable against exposure to heat and moisture compared with a single cation MAPbI(3) perovskite, the air-processed fabrication of stable mixed perovskite films out of the glove box has yet to be achieved in C-PSCs. We herein fabricate a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)-incorporated FA(x)MA(1-x)PbI(y)Br(3-y) perovskite film in ambient air, in which hydrophobic MWCNTs are firstly introduced into the mixed perovskite matrix to mediate the crystallization of FA(x)MA(1-x)PbI(y)Br(3-y) and prevent the erosion by moisture of the perovskite layer. Based on the as-prepared MWCNT-incorporated FA(x)MA(1-x)PbI(y)Br(3-y), the whole C-PSCs with the structure of ITO/SnO2/perovskite/C are constructed under actual ambient air conditions with low annealing temperature <150 degrees C, achieving outstanding power conversion efficiencies of 16.25% (0.08 cm(2)) and 12.34% (1 cm(2)). Particularly, the all-air-processed mixed cation C-PSCs maintain a long-term stability of 93% under ambient air conditions for 22 weeks, exhibiting the best ambient-air stability of PSCs fabricated in air so far. This study provides a feasible route for the commercialization development of low-cost, stable and efficient PSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available