4.8 Article

Identifying and Breaking Scaling Relations in Molecular Catalysis of Electrochemical Reactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 139, Issue 32, Pages 11000-11003

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b05642

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Molecular Electrocatalysis, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving molecular catalysis for important electrochemical proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions, such as the interconversions of H+/H-2, O-2/H2O, CO2/CO, and N-2/NH3, is an ongoing challenge. Synthetic modifications to the molecular catalysts are valuable but often show trade-offs between turnover frequency (TOF) and the effective overpotential required to initiate catalysis (eta(eff)). Herein, we derive a new approach for improving efficiencies-higher TOF at lower eta(eff)-by changing the concentrations and properties of the reactants and products, rather than by modifying the catalyst. The dependence of TOF on eta(eff) is shown to be quite different upon changing, for instance, the pK(a) of the acid HA versus the concentration or partial pressure of a reactant or product. Using the electrochemical reduction of dioxygen catalyzed by iron porphyrins in DMF as an example, decreasing [HA] 10-fold lowers eta(eff) by 59 mV and decreases the TOF by a factor of 10. Alternatively, a 10-fold decrease in K-a(HA) also lowers eta(eff) by 59 mV but only decreases the TOF by a factor of 2. This approach has been used to improve a catalytic TOF by 10(4) vs the previously reported scaling relationship developed via synthetic modifications to the catalyst. The analysis has the potential to predict improved efficiency and product selectivity of any molecular PCET catalyst, based on its mechanism and rate law.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available