4.8 Article

Critical insight: challenges and requirements of fibre electrodes for wearable electrochemical energy storage

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 2148-2160

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ee02607f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16JC1400700]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0201702/2016YFA0201700]
  3. Chenguang Program'' - Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673088]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program
  7. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT_16R13]
  8. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [111-2-04]
  9. Universiti Malaysia Pahang [RDU 172201]
  10. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship at the Australian National University, Canberra
  11. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  12. International Joint Laboratory for Advanced Fiber and Low-dimension Materials [18520750400]
  13. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [15CG32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This perspective seeks to provide some critical insights on the challenges facing the development and adoption of fibre (yarn)-based energy storage electrodes in possible future applications of smart textiles. Attention has been given to five major points, viz. the property requirements, the associated characterization techniques, the metrics of quantifying performance, the associated materials and the goals of innovation. Beyond these points, concise conclusions consisting of recommendations have been drawn in each section. The work is intended to guide and stimulate researchers towards an effective and efficient roadmap to obtain the right and best product on the new prospective and exciting market.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available