4.0 Article

Interdisciplinary Centers in Latin American Universities: The Challenges of Institutionalization

Journal

HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 461-483

Publisher

PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
DOI: 10.1057/s41307-018-0092-x

Keywords

interdisciplinarity; Latin America; university governance; higher education

Funding

  1. Espacio Interdisciplinario (Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)
  2. Council for Scientific Research (CSIC, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET, Argentina)
  4. Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Universities represent a particularly interesting environment for interdisciplinary development; as institutions, they are simultaneously guardians of tradition and spaces for experimentation. This article focuses on initiatives for the creation of institutional spaces for interdisciplinary research in three Latin American universities: Universidad de Buenos Aires in Argentina, Universidad de la Republica in Uruguay and Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. The article analyzes the processes of institutionalization of interdisciplinary centers. It compares (a) the context of creation, (b) the conception of interdisciplinarity, (c) the integration into preexisting structures and (d) internal organization and planning of the centers. Our analysis shows a diversity among institutionalization processes and supports the idea that there is no single model for the institutionalization of the interdisciplinary in the region. However, certain common characteristics can be found. These include a rigid bureaucratic structure and a paramount importance of creating consensus. These traits can be related to the legacy of the Cordoba Reform and the prevalence of a traditional institutional governance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available