4.6 Review

The application of CeO2-based materials in electrocatalysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 30, Pages 17675-17702

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta04804a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21671170, 21673203, 21201010]
  2. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP)
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents of the University in China [NCET-13-0645]
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [XKYCX17-038]
  5. Six Talent Plan [2015-XCL-030]
  6. Science and Technology Innovation Foster Foundation of Yangzhou University [2016CXJ010]
  7. Program for Colleges Natural Science Research in Jiangsu Province [18KJB150036]
  8. Qinglan Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several studies on electrocatalytic materials have made substantial progress, and it is essential to enhance the catalytic activity of these materials. CeO2-based materials have emerged as predominant candidates for electrocatalysis, such as the excellent performance of Ni/CeO2 interfacial nanostructures on highly conductive carbon nanotubes. First, we provide a comprehensive review of the catalytic performance of varied of CeO2-based materials (nanostructured, supported, doped, hybrid, coated, amorphous CeO2-based materials) and the electrocatalytic mechanisms. Furthermore, we introduce two strategies to achieve better catalytic performance, which are increasing the number of active sites and increasing the intrinsic activity of each active site, providing reasonable guidance for the development of enhanced catalysts. Finally, we discuss the limitations and challenges of CeO2-based materials, followed by their present status and prospects for future research. We believe that this review will be helpful for researchers and scientists who are seeking promising electrocatalytic materials and useful electrocatalyst development strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available