4.6 Review

Solution-based synthesis of lithium thiophosphate superionic conductors for solid-state batteries: a chemistry perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 30, Pages 17735-17753

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta04772g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project FESTBATT [03XP0177A]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All-solid-state batteries require solid electrolytes that exhibit both high mechanical and chemical stability, as well as a high ionic conductivity. Despite the many decades of research that have led to significant breakthroughs in this field, the synthesis of high-performance ionic conductors is still quite costly with limited scalability, i.e. it is highly energy and time intensive. To this end, the development of cheap and scalable solution-based approaches for fabricating state-of-the-art solid electrolytes is of great interest; however, a deeper understanding over the fundamental solution chemistry and reaction mechanisms governing these synthetic approaches is either absent or not broadly conveyed in the literature. Herein, we review some of the more recent works on solution-based syntheses of alkali thiophosphates contextualized within a broader scope of the literature in an attempt to provide some additional chemical insights and underline the areas where specific knowledge is lacking. Focusing primarily on Li+ containing electrolytes, we provide a deeper look into both prototypical reagents and possible alternatives, highlight the importance and potential influences of polysulfide/S-S bonding, and discuss the significance of precursor stoichiometry. We hope that this review provides a unique outlook on solution-based syntheses of alkali thiophosphates leading to a better understanding over the critical parameters that govern the optimization of this class of superionic conductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available