4.7 Article

Effects of microstructure on electrochemical reactivity and conductivity in nanostructured ceria thin films

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 283-292

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.15183

Keywords

energy discovery platforms; microstructure; nanostructured ceria; proton conduction; tr-KPFM; water splitting reaction

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1255379]
  2. Division Of Materials Research
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1255379] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proton conductivity in functional oxides is crucial in determining electrochemistry and transport phenomena in a number of applications such as catalytic devices and fuel cells. However, single characterization techniques are usually limited in detecting the ionic dynamics at the full range of environmental conditions. In this report, we probe and uncover the links between the microstructure of nanostructured ceria (NC) and parameters that govern its electrochemical reaction and proton transport, by coupling experimental data obtained with time-resolved Kelvin probe force microscopy (tr-KPFM), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and finite element analysis. It is found that surface morphology determines the water splitting rate and proton conductivity at 25 degrees C and wet conditions, when protons are mainly generated and transported within surface physisorbed water layers. However, at higher temperature (i.e., >= 125 degrees C) and dry conditions, when physisorbed water evaporates, grain size, and crystallographic orientation become significant factors. Specifically, the proton generation rate is negatively correlated with the grain size, whereas proton diffusivity is facilitated by surface {111} planes and additional conduction pathways offered by cracks and open pores connected to the surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available