4.6 Article

Frequency of and risk factors for tumor upstaging after wide local excision of primary cutaneous melanoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 341-348

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.018

Keywords

conventional excision; guidelines; melanoma; Mohs surgery; prognosis; reconstruction; sentinel lymph node biopsy; upstaging; wide local excision

Categories

Funding

  1. Dermatology Foundation Clinical Career Development Award in Dermatologic Surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Detecting a more advanced stage of the primary melanoma after wide local excision and reconstruction can complicate patient counseling about prognosis, management of surgical margins, and indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Objective: To identify the frequency of and risk factors associated with upstaging after wide local excision of primary melanoma. Methods: Retrospective, single center, cross-sectional study of 1332 consecutive in situ to stage T4a melanomas treated with wide local excision. Results: The overall rate of upstaging of melanoma was 3.9% (52/1332). After multivariate analysis, the greatest risk factor for upstaging was anatomic location on the head, neck, hands, feet, genitals, or pretibial leg (odds ratio [OR] 7.06, P <. 001) followed by extension of the melanoma to the base of the biopsy specimen (OR 3.42, P<. 001); the need for multiple preoperative scouting biopsies (OR 1.89, P =.004); older age (OR 1.03 per year, P =.002); and nonlentigo maligna histologic subtype (OR 3.6, P =.002). Limitations: This was a single-site, retrospective observational study. Conclusions: Clinicopathologic characteristics, particularly anatomic location on the head, neck, hands, feet, genitals, or pretibial leg and subtotal diagnostic biopsies, identify melanomas with an increased risk for upstaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available