4.6 Article

A low-cost strategy to synthesize MnO nanorods anchored on 3D biomass-derived carbon with superior microwave absorption properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 7, Issue 30, Pages 9219-9228

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9tc02182e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51525201]
  2. Innovative Research Group of National Natural Science Foundation of China [91216301, 11421091, 51202048, 11402252, 51372047]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.BRETIII.201506]
  4. National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments [KL.PYJH.2016.001]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M651282]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining [17-M-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strongly absorbing, thin, wide-bandwidth microwave absorption materials are highly desirable. Meanwhile, sustainable, abundant and low-cost wood with a highly porous 3D structure provides an excellent network and many other benefits, which inspired us to design new absorption materials. In this paper, we employed wood and KMnO4 as precursors to successfully prepare biomass-derived carbon/MnO nanorod (BDC/MnO NR) composites through a low-cost method combining hydrothermal treatment, carbonization and annealing. The minimum reflection loss (RLmin) of the BDC/MnO NR composites was -58.5 dB at a thickness of only 1.65 mm (for BDC, -15.2 dB at 5 mm), and the covered effective absorption bandwidth reached 14.5 GHz (for BDC, 3.4 GHz). The improvement in absorption performance can be attributed to the promotion of the impedance match and attenuation constant. Compared with previously reported similar microwave absorption materials, our products are thinner and have a stronger capacity, indicating that the BDC/MnO NR composites could be promising candidates as high-performance absorbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available