4.7 Article

Exploring children's learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 415-427

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.008

Keywords

Constructionism; Coding; Computational thinking; Engagement; Children; Design-based research

Funding

  1. Learning science the fun and creative way: coding, making and play as vehicles for informal science learning, in the 21st century Project, under the European Commission's Horizon 2020 SwafS-11-2017 Program [787476]
  2. Norwegian Research Council under the project FUTURE LEARNING [255129/H20]
  3. NOKUT under the Centre for Excellent IT Education (Excited) [16/02049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the last few years, the integration of coding activities for children in K-12 education has flourished. In addition, novel technological tools and programming environments have offered new opportunities and increased the need to design effective learning experiences. This paper presents a design-based research (DBR) approach conducted over two years, based on constructionism-based coding experiences for children, following the four stages of DBR. Three iterations (cycles) were designed and examined in total, with participants aged 8-17 years old, using mixed methods. Over the two years, we conducted workshops in which students used a block-based programming environment (i.e., Scratch) and collaboratively created a socially meaningful artifact (i.e., a game). The study identifies nine design principles that can help us to achieve higher engagement during the coding activity. Moreover, positive attitudes and high motivation were found to result in the better management of cognitive load. Our contribution lies in the theoretical grounding of the results in constructionism and the emerging design principles. In this way, we provide both theoretical and practical evidence of the value of constructionism-based coding activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available