4.6 Article

In situ construction of dual-morphology ZnCo2O4 for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors

Journal

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
Volume 1, Issue 8, Pages 3086-3094

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9na00230h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21271027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the controllable preparation of ZnCo2O4 with different morphologies in a reaction system and the orderly weaving of these morphologies into special structures was demonstrated, which might be impossible to achieve using other methods; herein, we successfully prepared a dual-morphology ZnCo2O4/N-doped reduced graphene oxide/Ni foam substrate (ZNGN) electrode by ultrasonic processing, a one-step hydrothermal method and a subsequent annealing process for high-performance supercapacitors. At first, ZnCo2O4 nanosheet orderly formed a honeycomb structure on the surface of Ni foam (NF); this improved the redox surface area of the electrode; then, feather-like ZnCo2O4 was evenly distributed over the honeycomb structure, playing the role of containment and fixation to provide space for material volume expansion during charging and discharging. The electrochemical test showed that the maximum capacitance of the ZNGN electrode was 1600 F g(-1) (960C g(-1)) at the current density of 1 A g(-1) in a 6 M KOH solution. Moreover, the asymmetric supercapacitor ZNGN//activated carbon (ZNGN//AC) displayed the excellent energy density of 66.1 W h kg(-1) at the power density of 701 W kg(-1). Compared with the capacitance (233.3 F g(-1) and 326.6C g(-1)) when ZNGN//AC was fully activated at 4 A g(-1), there was almost no loss in capacitance after 2000 charge-discharge cycles, and a 94% capacitance retention was achieved after 5000 cycles. Thus, this excellent electrochemical property highlights the potential application of the dual-morphology ZnCo2O4 electrode in supercapacitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available