3.8 Article

An empirical survey of the perceived benefits of executing BIM and sustainability practices in the built environment

Journal

CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 321-342

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/CI-08-2018-0065

Keywords

Sustainability; BIM; Benefits; Implementation; Construction industry; Built environment

Funding

  1. Sustainable City Laboratory
  2. Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The increasing urbanization of the built environment has bolstered the need to promote green Building Information Modeling (BIM) initiative in new construction projects and the rehabilitation of old premises. This study aims to explore and examine the key benefits of the implementation of BIM and sustainability practices in the built environment. Design/methodology/approach The study gathered the worldwide perceptions of 220 survey participants from 21 countries which were analyzed using descriptive and inferential analytical methods. The identified individual benefits of green BIM were further categorized into their underlying clusters using factor analysis. Findings The key benefits are related to enhancing project efficiency and productivity, ensuring real-time sustainable design and multi-design alternatives, facilitating the selection of sustainable materials and components, together with reducing material wastage and project's environmental impact, among others. The study analyzed and compared the perceptions of the diverse groups of the respondents as well. Originality/value The study identified salient benefits of the adoption of BIM and sustainability practices. The proper integration of these concepts and the execution of the recommended useful strategies by construction stakeholders, policymakers and local authorities will enable the built environment to reap the gains of its implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available