4.5 Article

Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2

Keywords

CRISPR-Cas9; Mouse; Transgenesis; Homology-directed repair; Conditional knockout mouse; Floxed allele; Oligonucleotide; Long single-stranded DNA; Machine learning; Reproducibility

Funding

  1. National Collaborative Research Infrastructure (NCRIS) via the Australian Phenomics Network (APN)
  2. Institutional Development Award [P20GM103471]
  3. NIGMS [1P30GM110768-01, P30CA036727]
  4. British Heart Foundation [FS12-57, FS12/57/29717, CH/13/2/30154, RG/15/12/31616]
  5. Wellcome Trust [107849/Z/15/Z, 097820/Z11/B, 105610/Z/14/Z, 104192/Z/14/Z]
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/N029992/1, MR/P011853/1, MR/P023576/, MR/P023576/1]
  7. National BioResource Project of Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (MEXT/AMED), Japan
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP [142452]
  9. Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute - National Institute of Health (NIH), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award [UL1 TR001108]
  10. NIH [UM1OD023221, HL 123658, P01 CA217798, P30CA16672, R50CA211121, HL138987]
  11. American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine
  12. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) [LM2015040, CZ. 1.05/1.1.00/02.0109, CZ. 1.05/2.1.00/19.0395]
  13. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [RVO 68378050]
  14. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N015584/1]
  15. Royal Society
  16. FQRS
  17. BBSRC [BB/N015584/1, BB/P027040/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. MRC [MR/N029992/1, MR/P023576/1, MR/P023576/2, MR/M008908/1, MR/P011853/1, MR/L010240/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  19. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/P027040/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. Wellcome Trust [105610/Z/14/Z, 104192/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed) alleles by microinjection of 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides as donors (referred herein as two-donor floxing method). Results We re-evaluate the two-donor method from a consortium of 20 laboratories across the world. The dataset constitutes 56 genetic loci, 17,887 zygotes, and 1718 live-born mice, of which only 15 (0.87%) mice contain cKO alleles. We subject the dataset to statistical analyses and a machine learning algorithm, which reveals that none of the factors analyzed was predictive for the success of this method. We test some of the newer methods that use one-donor DNA on 18 loci for which the two-donor approach failed to produce cKO alleles. We find that the one-donor methods are 10- to 20-fold more efficient than the two-donor approach. Conclusion We propose that the two-donor method lacks efficiency because it relies on two simultaneous recombination events in cis, an outcome that is dwarfed by pervasive accompanying undesired editing events. The methods that use one-donor DNA are fairly efficient as they rely on only one recombination event, and the probability of correct insertion of the donor cassette without unanticipated mutational events is much higher. Therefore, one-donor methods offer higher efficiencies for the routine generation of cKO animal models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available