4.4 Article

Rietveld Quantitative Stability of Portland Blast Furnace Slag Cement Between Internal and External Standard Methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 191-198

Publisher

AMER SOC TESTING MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20160240

Keywords

Rietveld; external standard method; internal standard method; cement; quantitative analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602126, 51102181]
  2. Program for Scientific Research Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The internal and external standard (G-factor) methods were applied to Rietveld/XRD quantitative analysis of Portland blast furnace slag cement using X'Pert Highscore Plus and GSAS-EXPGUI software. The Rietveld quantitative result derived from G-factor calculation and application was compared by internal standard methodology, which was employed by separately adding 20 and 50 % (weight percentage) of SiO2. The results show that the quantitations obtained by both of the above independent methods are almost consistent. In addition, the quantitative difference of most crystalline phases are less than 1 % except C(4)AF, about 1.2 %, while the amorphous determination has the quantitative difference of 2.1 %. Beside the careful sample preparation, proper XRD pattern collection, and satisfactory Rietveld refined procedure, the polished quartz rock used for mean G-factor calculation and the modified formula for amorphous calculation contributed to the Rietveld quantitative stability and reasonability. The formula based on amorphous quantification by internal standard was expressed as W-Amor = 1-(W-S(1-W'(S(PS+Sta))))/((W'(S(PS+Sta))-W'(S(PS)))(1-W-S)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available