4.7 Review

Factors influencing the membrane fluidity and the impact on production of lactic acid bacteria starters

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 17, Pages 6867-6883

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-10002-1

Keywords

Fluorescence anisotropy; Lipid phase transition; Preservation processes; Environmental stress

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie research and innovation program [777657]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [777657] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production of lactic acid bacteria starters for manufacturing food, probiotic, and chemical products requires the application of successive steps: fermentation, concentration, stabilization, and storage. Despite process optimization, losses of bacterial viability and functional activities are observed after stabilization and storage steps due to cell exposure to environmental stresses (thermal, osmotic, mechanical, and oxidative). Bacterial membrane is the primary target for injury and its damage is highly dependent on its physical properties and lipid organization. Membrane fluidity is a key property for maintaining cell functionality, and depends on lipid composition and cell environment. Extensive evidence has been reported on changes in membrane fatty acyl chains when modifying fermentation conditions. However, a deep characterization of membrane physical properties and their evolution following production processes is scarcely reported. Therefore, the aims of this mini-review are (i) to define the membrane fluidity and the methods used to assess it and (ii) to summarize the effect of environmental conditions on membrane fluidity and the resulting impact on the resistance of lactic acid bacteria to the stabilization processes. This will make it possible to highlight existing gaps of knowledge and opens up novel approaches for future investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available