4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of tumor length in patients receiving esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 8, Pages 1114-1122

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24789

Keywords

esophagectomy; esophageal cancer; recurrence; survival; tumor length

Funding

  1. Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Charity (Upper Gastrointestinal Fund)
  2. Upper GI Blues Charity, Sandwell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsWe investigated the prognostic value of tumor length measurements acquired both from pre-operative imaging and post-operative pathology in esophageal cancer. MethodsTumor lengths were examined retrospectively for 389 esophagectomy patients with respect to Endoscopy, EUS (Endoscopic Ultrasound), CT and PET-CT, and pathology. Correlations between the measurements on the different approaches were assessed, and associations between tumor length and survival were analyzed. ResultsOnly the tumor lengths assessed on pathology were found to be significantly associated with overall (P=0.001) and recurrence free (P<0.001) survival on univariable analysis. The median overall survival was 47.1 months in those patients with tumor lengths <3.0cm, falling to 19.6 and 18.0 months in those with 3.0-4.4 and 4.5+cm tumors, respectively, demonstrating a reduction in patient survival at a tumor length of around 3cm. Tumor length on pathology was significantly correlated with tumor differentiation and both T- and N-categories. After accounting for these factors, tumor length on pathology was a significant independent predictor of recurrence-free (P=0.016), but not overall (P=0.128) survival. ConclusionsTumor lengths on pathology were found to be the most predictive of patient outcome. However, after accounting for other tumor-related factors, tumor length only resulted in a marginal improvement in predictive accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available