3.8 Article

Effect of preparation method on the properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/mesoporous silica composites

Journal

EMERGENT MATERIALS
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 363-370

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42247-019-00057-1

Keywords

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA); Mesoporous silica (MCM-41); In situ polymerisation; Melt mixing; Thermal degradation kinetics; C-13 {H-1} CP-MAS-NMR

Funding

  1. Qatar National Library
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa - Qatar National Library

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preparation method of a polymer composite and the filler loading are amongst the factors that influence the properties of the final composites. This article studies the effect of these factors on the thermal stability and thermal degradation kinetics of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/mesoporous silica (MCM-41) composites filled with small amounts of MCM-41. The PMMA/MCM-41 composites were prepared through in situ polymerisation and melt mixing methods, with MCM-41 loadings of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 wt.%. The presence of MCM-41 increased the thermal stability of PMMA/MCM-41 composites prepared by melt mixing, but in the case of the in situ polymerised samples, the MCM-41 accelerated the degradation of the polymer. As a result, the activation energy was low and less energy was required to initiate and propagate the degradation process of these composites. The small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements showed that the preparation method of the composites had no influence on the pore size of MCM-41, but the PMMAs used in the two methods both had shorter chains than the MCM-41 pore size. This allowed the polymer chains to be trapped inside the pores of the filler and be immobilised, as was observed from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The immobilisation of the polymer chains was more significant in the in situ polymerised samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available