4.8 Article

In situ training of feed-forward and recurrent convolutional memristor networks

Journal

NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE
Volume 1, Issue 9, Pages 434-442

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0089-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Air Force Research Laboratory [FA8750-18-2-0122]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [D17PC00304]
  3. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Chip
  4. National Science Foundation of China [61674089, 61674092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The explosive growth of machine learning is largely due to the recent advancements in hardware and architecture. The engineering of network structures, taking advantage of the spatial or temporal translational isometry of patterns, naturally leads to bio-inspired, shared-weight structures such as convolutional neural networks, which have markedly reduced the number of free parameters. State-of-the-art microarchitectures commonly rely on weight-sharing techniques, but still suffer from the von Neumann bottleneck of transistor-based platforms. Here, we experimentally demonstrate the in situ training of a five-level convolutional neural network that self-adapts to non-idealities of the one-transistor one-memristor array to classify the MNIST dataset, achieving similar accuracy to the memristor-based multilayer perceptron with a reduction in trainable parameters of similar to 75% owing to the shared weights. In addition, the memristors encoded both spatial and temporal translational invariance simultaneously in a convolutional long short-term memory network-a memristor-based neural network with intrinsic 3D input processing-which was trained in situ to classify a synthetic MNIST sequence dataset using just 850 weights. These proof-of-principle demonstrations combine the architectural advantages of weight sharing and the area/energy efficiency boost of the memristors, paving the way to future edge artificial intelligence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available