3.8 Article

Physical Activity for Autistic Adults: Recommendations for a Shift in Approach

Journal

AUTISM IN ADULTHOOD
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 173-181

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/aut.2019.0016

Keywords

exercise; well-being; running; walking; health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical activity is beneficial for physical and mental health in the general population. Among autistic people, a range of physical and mental health conditions, particularly depression and anxiety, occur more frequently than in the general population. Physical activity interventions could help improve physical and mental health in autistic adults, but there is a lack of research in the area. The aim of this perspective article is to explore research into physical activity interventions for autistic adults, and identify gaps particularly in need of addressing. This perspective article considers six intervention studies carried out with adults, a pilot study, and seven review studies of adult and child interventions. Studies found significant increases in amount of physical activity undertaken, well-being, interaction, emotion, and regulation. There were decreases in imitative and distress behaviors. However, there were few studies, samples were small, participants all had co-occurring intellectual disability (ID), and measures were heterogeneous with lack of assessment of changes in physical fitness levels. Qualitative exploration was extremely limited. Recommendations are that there should be increased focus on research into physical activity for autistic adults, with input from autistic people to identify enjoyable, accessible activities. There should be particular consideration of longer term, sustainable activities for autistic people both with and without ID. Finally, but of major importance, there should be an increased focus on addressing mental health and anxiety through physical activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available