4.5 Article

Logical design of oral glucose ingestion pattern minimizing blood glucose in humans

Journal

NPJ SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41540-019-0108-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Creation of Fundamental Technologies for Understanding and Control of Biosystem Dynamics, CREST, of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJCR12W3]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [17H06300, 17H6299, 18H03979, 19K22860]
  3. Kayamori Foundation of Informational Science Advancement
  4. [16K12508]
  5. [19K20382]
  6. [18K16578]
  7. [16H06577]
  8. [15KT0021]
  9. [15K00246]
  10. [16H01554]
  11. [18H04801]
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H03979, 19K22860] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excessive increase in blood glucose level after eating increases the risk of macroangiopathy, and a method for not increasing the postprandial blood glucose level is desired. However, a logical design method of the dietary ingestion pattern controlling the postprandial blood glucose level has not yet been established. We constructed a mathematical model of blood glucose control by oral glucose ingestion in three healthy human subjects, and predicted that intermittent ingestion 30 min apart was the optimal glucose ingestion patterns that minimized the peak value of blood glucose level. We confirmed with subjects that this intermittent pattern consistently decreased the peak value of blood glucose level. We also predicted insulin minimization pattern, and found that the intermittent ingestion 30 min apart was optimal, which is similar to that of glucose minimization pattern. Taken together, these results suggest that the glucose minimization is achieved by suppressing the peak value of insulin concentration, rather than by enhancing insulin concentration. This approach could be applied to design optimal dietary ingestion patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available