4.5 Article

Systematic study of the break-up fusion process in the 12C + 165Ho system and interplay of entrance channel parameters

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024622

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand the low-energy incomplete fusion (ICF) reaction dynamics, the excitation function measurements of C-12 + Ho-165 system has been performed in the energy region of approximate to 4-7 MeV/nucleon, by employing the stacked foil activation technique. The cross sections of the measured evaporation residues are compared with the theoretical predictions of statistical model code PACE4, which takes into account only the complete fusion (CF) reaction cross section. It is observed that residues populated via xn and pxn channels are in good agreement with the PACE4 predictions, implying that these residues are populated via CF process. However, in the case of alpha-emission channels a significant enhancement from the PACE4 predictions is observed even after the deduction of precursor contribution, which is accredited to ICF process. The projectile break-up probability is found to increase with increment in the incident projectile energy. Further, the dependence of incomplete fusion dynamics on entrance channel parameters like mass asymmetry, Coulomb effect (Z(P)Z(T)), and projectile Q(alpha), value is systematically studied. The present results reveal that a single entrance channel parameter does not oversee the ICF reaction dynamics but have varying contributions depending upon the projectile-target combination. Moreover, the effect of projectile break-up on complete fusion cross section at energies above the Coulomb barrier is also studied. The suppression in fusion cross section is observed when compared with the universal fusion function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available