4.6 Article

Electrochemical analysis of Na-Ni bimetallic phosphate electrodes for supercapacitor applications

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 9, Issue 43, Pages 25012-25021

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra04487f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [61056]
  3. University of Pretoria
  4. NRF through the SARChI in Carbon Technology and Materials
  5. Al Fashir University, Sudan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bimetallic sodium-nickel phosphate/graphene foam composite (NaNi4(PO4)(3)/GF) was successfully synthesized using a direct and simple precipitation method. The hierarchically structured composite material was observed to have demonstrated a synergistic effect between the conductive metallic cations and the graphene foam that made up the composite. The graphene served as a base-material for the growth of NaNi4(PO4)(3) particles, resulting in highly conductive composite material as compared to the pristine material. The NaNi4(PO4)(3)/GF composite electrode measured in a 3-electrode system achieved a maximum specific capacity of 63.3 mA h g(-1) at a specific current of 1 A g(-1) in a wide potential range of 0.0-1.0 V using 2 M NaNO3 aqueous electrolyte. A designed and fabricated hybrid NaNi4(PO4)(3)/GF//AC device based on NaNi4(PO4)(3)/GF as positive electrode and activated carbon (AC) selected as a negative electrode could operate well in an extended cell potential of 2.0 V. As an assessment, the hybrid NaNi4(PO4)(3)/GF//AC device showed the highest energy and power densities of 19.5 W h kg(-1) and 570 W kg(-1), respectively at a specific current of 0.5 A g(-1). The fabricated device could retain an 89% of its initial capacity with a coulombic efficiency of about 94% over 5000 cycling test, which suggests the material's potential for energy storage devices applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available