4.8 Article

Imaging of Unstained DNA Origami Triangles with Electron Microscopy

Journal

SMALL METHODS
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201900393

Keywords

atomic force microscopy; DNA origami; scanning transmission electron microscopy; signal-to-noise ratio; unstained DNA

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-07CH11358]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Imaging of scaffolded DNA and DNA origami nanostructures has been dominated by atomic force microscopy of samples immobilized on bulk substrates. Less commonly used are electron microscopy techniques, typically carried out after negative staining of DNA structures or by using cryo-transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Here, direct imaging of unstained DNA origami on common electron-transparent substrates with utilizing high angular annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) is reported. This approach establishes a method for depositing and imaging intact DNA triangles with mass-thickness contrast sufficient to measure the scaffold-to-scaffold distances and the length of the triangle's seam. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the DNA supported on amorphous carbon as a function of the carbon thickness is measured on three types of commercially available TEM grids. This allows for edge detection of approximate to 1 nm height DNA triangles on carbon substrates as thick as approximate to 25 nm. Observations on the effect on SNR with the imaging modes are discussed. The effect of cation concentration used for pretreating the grid on the image resolution is also explored. This work presents proof-of-concept results demonstrating that electron microscopy can be used to resolve key elements of the DNA origami triangle without the use of staining protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available