4.4 Article

Shear Resistance of a Biaxial Hollow Composite Floor System with GFRP Plates

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001657

Keywords

Composite floor; Composite beam; Shear capacity; Biaxial hollow concrete slab; Glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) plate; Reduced story height; Metal and composite structures

Funding

  1. Korea University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2013R1A2A2A01067872]
  3. Architecture & Urban Development Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [15AUDP-B100343-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new composite floor system was developed to reduce floor-to-floor height and to improve structural capacity and fire resistance as compared with existing encased composite floor systems. The proposed system is composed of asymmetric steel beams with web openings, a biaxial hollow concrete slab, and glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) plates. The shear resistance of the typical composite beams is commonly determined based on the shear strength of the steel web alone. However, for the proposed system, because the steel web has several circular openings, the concrete contribution to the shear resistance should be included in the design equation. In this paper, tests and finite-element analyses were conducted to evaluate the contribution of the shear-resisting components in the proposed system. An asymmetric steel beam with web openings, inner concrete panels, and a biaxial hollow concrete slab within the effective width for shear were considered as shear-resisting components. Each component fully resisted the applied shear force, exceeding the expected value until failure, and the design equation suggested was suitable for predicting the shear strength of the proposed system. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available