4.2 Article

Assessment of Vascular Stent Heating with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 1121-1127

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.12.030

Keywords

Stent; rTMS; temperature; stroke; magnetic field; implant

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K01HD069504]
  2. American Heart Association [13BGIA17120055, 16GRNT27720019]
  3. NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative [RPC2014-1067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A high proportion of patients with stroke do not qualify for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) clinical studies due to the presence of metallic stents. The ultimate concern is that any metal could become heated due to eddy currents. However, to date, no clinical safety data are available regarding the risk of metallic stents heating with rTMS. Methods: We tested the safety of common rTMS protocols (1 Hz and 10 Hz) with stents used commonly in stroke, nitinol and elgiloy. In our method, stents were tested in gelled saline at 2 different locations: at the center and at the lobe of the coil. In addition, at each location, stent heating was evaluated in 3 different orientations: parallel to the long axis of coil, parallel to the short axis of the coil, and perpendicular to the plane of the coil. Results: We found that stents did not heat to more than 1 degrees C with either 1 Hz rTMS or 10 Hz rTMS in any configuration or orientation. Heating in general was greater at the lobe when the stent was oriented perpendicularly. Conclusions: Our study represents a new method for ex vivo quantification of stent heating. We have found that heating of stents was well below the Food and Drug Administration standards of 2 degrees C. Thus, our study paves the way for in vivo testing of rTMS (<= 10 Hz) in the presence of implanted magnetic resonance imaging-compatible stents in animal studies. When planning human safety studies though, geometry, orientation, and location relative to the coil would be important to consider as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available