4.4 Article

Why Does Deep and Cheap Learning Work So Well?

Journal

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS
Volume 168, Issue 6, Pages 1223-1247

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-017-1836-5

Keywords

Artificial neural networks; Deep learning; Statistical physics

Funding

  1. Foundational Questions Institute
  2. Rothberg Family Fund for Cognitive Science
  3. NSF [1122374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show how the success of deep learning could depend not only on mathematics but also on physics: although well-known mathematical theorems guarantee that neural networks can approximate arbitrary functions well, the class of functions of practical interest can frequently be approximated through cheap learning with exponentially fewer parameters than generic ones. We explore how properties frequently encountered in physics such as symmetry, locality, compositionality, and polynomial log-probability translate into exceptionally simple neural networks. We further argue that when the statistical process generating the data is of a certain hierarchical form prevalent in physics and machine learning, a deep neural network can be more efficient than a shallow one. We formalize these claims using information theory and discuss the relation to the renormalization group. We prove various no-flattening theorems showing when efficient linear deep networks cannot be accurately approximated by shallow ones without efficiency loss; for example, we show that n variables cannot be multiplied using fewer than neurons in a single hidden layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available