Journal
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 3-16Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12384
Keywords
colonization credit; edge effects; forest core species; land use history; periphery-to-interior gradient; plant dispersal limitation
Categories
Funding
- Research Program 'Biodiversite et Gestion Forestiere' of the French Ministry of Environment through GIP Ecofor (project 'Distrafor')
- French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the 'Investissements d'Avenir' program [ANR-11-LABX-0002-01]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
AimTo disentangle whether long-range periphery-to-core gradient of forest understorey plants could be attributed to past forest landscape and/or to current environmental filtering processes. We investigated (1) whether species response to past land use (ancient versus recent forest) was consistent with species response to distance to present forest edge (core versus periphery) (2) what life-history traits explained plant response to distance to present edge and past land use (3) whether distance to past forest edge explained current species distribution better than distance to present forest edge. LocationTemperate forests in the northern half of France (80,000km(2)). MethodsLocal climate, soil and stand characteristics, past land use, and present and past landscape metrics were collected on 11,936 plots using National Forest Inventory data and historical maps from 1831. Logistic regressions were applied to determine the response patterns of 181 species to present and past landscape, while controlling for local habitat quality (soil, climate and stand). ResultsSpecies response to distance to present edge very well matched response to past land use. Plant traits related to colonization capacity explained species response to present edge and past land use. The spatial distribution of 42 species was better explained by distance to forest edge in 1831, 37 species were better explained by distance to present edge and 24 species were better explained by distance to present edge and past land use. Main conclusionsTwo mechanisms were responsible for the long-range periphery-to-core gradient: (1) past landscape and colonization processes and (2) present edge-related mechanisms. This suggests that plant community differences between periphery and core zones are thus related to dispersal limitation and not only to environmental filters. Our results underline the need to combine landscape ecology and history and have important implications for forest plant dynamics and conservation in the context of climate change.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available