4.7 Article

Gedanken experiments to destroy a BTZ black hole

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044043

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brinson Foundation
  2. Simons Foundation [568762]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-1708212, PHY-1708213]
  4. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [103-2112-M-003-001-MY3]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11505119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider Gedanken experiments to destroy an extremal or near-extremal Banados-Teitelboim-Zanelli (BTZ) black hole by throwing matter into the horizon. These black holes are vacuum solutions to (2 + 1)dimensional gravity theories, and are asymptotically AdS(3). Provided the null energy condition for the falling matter, we prove the following-(i) in a Mielke-Baekler model without ghost fields, when torsion is present, an extremal BTZ black hole can be overspun and becomes a naked conical singularity; (ii) in three-dimensional Einstein gravity and chiral gravity, which both live in the torsionless limits of the Mielke-Baekler model, an extremal BTZ black hole cannot be overspun; and (iii) in both Einstein gravity and chiral gravity, a near-extremal BTZ black hole cannot be overspun, leaving the weak cosmic censorship preserved. To obtain these results, we follow the analysis of Sorce and Wald on their Gedanken experiments to destroy a Kerr-Newman black hole, and calculate the second order variation of the black hole mechanics. Furthermore, Wald's type of Gedanken experiments provide an operational procedure of proving the third law of black hole dynamics. Through the AdS/CFT correspondence, our results on BTZ black holes also indicate that a third law of thermodynamics holds for the holographic conformal field theories dual to three-dimensional Einstein gravity and chiral gravity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available