4.3 Review

Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1939-1964

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7

Keywords

Lithiumion batteries; Lithium metal batteries; Post-lithium ion batteries; Energy density; History of batteries

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03XP0047A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L). Currently, they do not only dominate the small format battery market for portable electronic devices, but have also been successfully implemented as the technology of choice for electromobility as well as for stationary energy storage. Besides LIBs, a variety of different technologically promising battery concepts exists that, depending on the respective technology, might also be suitable for various application purposes. These systems of the next generation, the so-called post-lithium ion batteries (PLIBs), such as metal/sulfur, metal/air or metal/oxygen, or post-lithium technologies (systems without Li), which are based on alternative single (Na+, K+) or multivalent ions (Mg2+, Ca2+), are currently being studied intensively. From today's point of view, it seems quite clear that there will not only be a single technology for all applications (technology monopoly), but different battery systems, which can be especially suitable or combined for a particular application (technology diversity). In this review, we place the lithium ion technology in a historical context and give insights into the battery technology diversity that evolved during the past decades and which will, in turn, influence future research and development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available