Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 56TH ACM/EDAC/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (DAC)
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3316781.3317779
Keywords
Critical Systems; Autonomous Driving; ISO 26262
Funding
- European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [772773]
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [TIN2015-65316-P]
- HiPEAC Network of Excellence
- MINECO [RYC-2013-14717, FJCI-2017-34095]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The complexity and size of Autonomous Driving (AD) software are comparably higher than that of software implementing other (standard) functionalities in the car. To make things worse, a big fraction of AD software is not specifically designed for the automotive (or any other critical) domain, but the mainstream market. This brings uncertainty on to which extent AD software adheres to guidelines in safety standards. In this paper, we present our experience in applying ISO 26262 - the applicable functional safety standard for road vehicles - software safety guidelines to industrial AD software, in particular, Apollo, a heterogeneous Autonomous Driving framework used extensively in industry. We provide quantitative and qualitative metrics of compliance for many ISO 26262 recommendations on software design, implementation, and testing.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
Share Paper
