4.1 Article

MORPHOMETRIC RELATIONSHIPS AND SHELL FORM OF CULTURED WINGED PEARL OYSTERS (PTERIA PENGUIN) IN TONGA

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 677-682

Publisher

NATL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2983/035.036.0317

Keywords

pearl oyster; pearl production; shell dimensions; morphometrics; mabe; Tonga; Pteria penguin

Funding

  1. University of the Sunshine Coast Graduate Research School
  2. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)
  3. ACIAR Project [FIS/2016/126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shell dimensions of 588 hatchery-produced Pteria penguin (Roding, 1798) were measured and analyzed to describe morphometric changes in shell form of this species over its life cycle. Oysters ranged from 9.4 to 202.2 mm in dorsoventral height (DVH), 0.1-1,526.9 g in weight and spanned 0.5-5 y of age. Significant positive curvilinear relationships were observed between shell width (SW) and DVH (R-2 = 0.99, P < 0.001), diagonal length (DL) and DVH (R-2 = 0.99, P < 0.001), shell thickness (ST) and DVH (R-2 = 0.98, P < 0.001), and wet weight (WW) and DVH (R-2 = 0.99, P < 0.001). Trends in the morphometric ratios of P. penguin indicated a proportional decrease in SW and DL with increasing DVH, resulting in a shift from a horizontally elongate to a vertically elongate shell form. The ST of P. penguin remained proportionally stable over its life cycle, whereas its WW increased proportionally by more than two orders of magnitude. Based on the results of this study, future research should examine (1) the relationship between the external shell dimensions and internal nacreous area, (2) changes in nacre deposition rate in different shell locations, and (3) the relationship between soft tissue weight, shell weight, nacre thickness, and DVH of P. penguin. The description of the growth form of P. penguin represents an important first step toward determining optimum half-pearl (mabe) culture procedures for P. penguin in Tonga.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available