4.7 Article

Interplay between SM precision, BSM physics, and the measurements of αhad in μ-e scattering

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.035030

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER Grant [PHY-1652066]
  2. National Science Foundation [PHY-1652066, PHY1719690]
  3. Center for Computational Research at the University at Buffalo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Muon electron scattering experiments such as the proposed MUonE experiment offer an opportunity for an improved measurement of the leading-order hadronic running of alpha, denoted Delta alpha(had). Such a measurement could be utilized to reduce the theoretical uncertainty on the prediction of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, g - 2. Currently, there is a discrepancy between theory and data for this observable, which could potentially be explained by beyond the Standard Model (BSM) physics. Here we investigate the possible impact of missing Standard Model (SM) higher-order corrections and BSM physics on the proposed measurement of Delta alpha(had). In principle, either could be indirectly fitted into Delta alpha(had), causing inconsistencies if used in a g - 2 application. The literature suggests a target of 10 ppm on the cross section for the theoretical accuracy. We assess the validity of this target in detail using a variety of methods, finding that a 1 ppm target is a more conservative estimate to ensure that missing higher orders do not dominate the theoretical uncertainty. For the potential BSM contributions, we study various models which contribute first at tree and loop level. Of particular interest is the impact from dark photon models, which can potentially affect the measurement of Delta alpha(had) at the desired accuracy. At loop level, there exists in general a kinematic suppression adequate to reduce the BSM contributions to a level which can be neglected for the extraction of Delta alpha(had).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available